the fest "trans" policy...

topic posted Wed, September 24, 2003 - 3:03 PM by  Yvonne
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
i would love to continue this topic and brainstorm together for possible POA's (plan of action). For people like me let's start from the beginning....
please help me define the "policy" that stands in place now. all i know is that it has to do with trans and about not letting some in and letting others in but i don't know what defines admittance to the fest....
is it to be found somewhere on their website or is a "hidden" policy...is it written or just known....
please help.
Thanks...
let's do this..
posted by:
Yvonne
San Diego
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: the fest "trans" policy...

    Mon, September 29, 2003 - 11:53 AM
    i know ive seen the policy in writing.....so i will attempt to track it down. perhaps it is in the fest schedule thingy. or archived on line. ill get back with it.....
    • Re: the fest "trans" policy...

      Mon, September 29, 2003 - 1:48 PM
      well im at work so here's what ive been able to locate. i may know some folks who have the orginal text but it may take a bit to track that down.

      in the mean time, heres a link to the text of a flyer handed out at the 2000 fest which is posted at the camptrans 2000 website.


      http://www.camptrans.com/press/2000_mwmf.html


      i know that there were no flyers about the policy handed out at the 2002 or 2003 fest. the research continues......
      • Re: the fest "trans" policy...

        Mon, September 29, 2003 - 1:50 PM
        ok apparently my html skillz suck. and the link above generates an error.
        • Re: the fest "trans" policy...

          Tue, November 4, 2003 - 1:30 PM
          by fest do you mean lillith? because it is not the only female only festival, and it probably has the worst line-up of acts. if you want to go because you are not allowed, you are feeding off the male priviledge that says you belong there in the first place. if it is to see the bands i just feel sorry for you.
          • Re: the fest "trans" policy...

            Tue, November 4, 2003 - 1:41 PM
            ummmm nope definitely not lilith fair.
            • Re: the fest "trans" policy...

              Tue, November 4, 2003 - 2:08 PM
              oh. how excitingly secretive you people are. jesus.
              • Re: the fest "trans" policy...

                Tue, November 4, 2003 - 2:27 PM
                thought it was pretty clear from the tribe description which fest we're talking bout. not meaning to be secretive. just wanted to answer yr question. so if ya wanna add to thread feel free.....
                • Re: the fest "trans" policy...

                  Tue, November 4, 2003 - 2:46 PM
                  yes you are right. going back over the misspelled synopsis of this tribe i realize now that it is michigans woman-fest or whatever. now what i want to know is what is the strong attraction to this particular festival. is it because you were asked not to be there. if so, we all know exclusion is wrong. there is no argument here. but, the seperation into a trans-camp is not inclusive. has there been instance of trans-manipulation? i.e. someone who really doesn't understand what male priveledge entails. some trans folk put on the dress then yell at the wife to "fetch" them a beer. i personally would be mortified to be in the same room as someone so indifferent to the struggles of women born women. i want us all to get along but that can't happen until we respect the boundaries placed by others. that said good luck to the transfolk involved i hope they make good on their fight for inclusion. just don't step on many heads to get there.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: the fest "trans" policy...

                    Tue, November 4, 2003 - 7:34 PM
                    You are complaining about misspelling but don't follow grammar rules about capitalizing the first letter of a sentance... nice.

                    Second, how are you defining "trans?" There are major difference between Transgendered, Transsexuals and Transvestites. Your "fetch me a beer" example sounds closer to Transvestites aka Cross-dressers. I believe, and jen can correct me if I am wrong, this forum has more to do with those who are Transgendered and/or Transexual.

                    And Lilith faire was NOT female only in attendance. The faire in question was limiting those who could attend. If you didn't have the right gonads and present your gender in the right way, you could not attend.

                    Frankly I think the whole "womyn born womyn" thing is just as nausiating as men being considered less than "real men" because they wish to take on caretaker roles. What the hell is a "Real Woman" anyway?
                    • Re: the fest "trans" policy...

                      Tue, November 4, 2003 - 9:32 PM
                      right-on Margo. Have you been to the fest? Alright my understanding of the policy is this:Its not about presenting your gender in a specified way, or in an appropriate way. Womyn are absolutely free to be anything they want. Lots of women who consider themselves genderqueer attend. They run the gammet of 'butch' to 'femme'. As a friend of mine told me, who works at the fest every year, they don't do a "panty" check. They ask that only folks who were born women attend. And women who have not (not completely anyway) had sexual reassignment surgery. As discussed previously, there was an official statement given. I never saw it. But that is my understanding. The thing that makes it difficult is that the policy is exclussionary not for the purpose of marginalizing or dismissing anyone who doesn't fit, but for the purpose or creating a temporary and rather sacred space for womyn. But the overall vibe is one of complete respect and love for everyone. I think that the policy sucks, but i don't think that there is an easy answer. I would love to hear from other folks, especially those who've been to the fest, what you think about possible changes. Do ya'll think that it should just be a point blank open door policy, or should it maintain the womyns space but broaden their def of womyn? The struggle that i have with it is this: I think that everyone should feel free to define their gender by any means they deam appropriate. I would never begin to tell anyone who they were on any level. But the festival is not the world at large, and I would also defend any privite groups right to create a space for themselves.
                      • Re: the fest "trans" policy...

                        Mon, November 10, 2003 - 2:44 PM
                        the fest policy-offical is that it is only for women born women so even if a person is a post-op trangendered woman they are offically not welcome or wanted in the space by the organizers. the policy was on thier website-it was taken down. i have been to the festival, i am not a trans woman and there are many transmen, tranny boi, genderqueers and even transwomen who do attend the event but they are all suppose to be on the downlow. some people have ahuge problem with transwomen there and are mean and hurtful while others have no problem with transwomen there. i personally believe that the festival should be about self-iding. if someone ids as a women who the f am i to deny thier own identity? i probably will not go to the festival again until the policy changes. it is not a group i wish to identify with but i am open to disussion of why some women have biarny gender definations and especially looking at the rejection and hatred that some lesbians have for transwomen. I fell that transwomen are used as scapegoat for women who haven't dealt with thier own issues.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: the fest "trans" policy...

                    Thu, November 6, 2003 - 7:05 AM
                    its not really about being right. i created this tribe as a space for discussion about a particular issue. as a moderator i often assume that those requesting to join have read the description and are interested in joining based on that information.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: the fest "trans" policy...

                    Mon, November 10, 2003 - 2:49 PM
                    hmm-trans-manupulation-what the hell is that please isn't that some lesbian separtatist fantasy? cause i sure have nver actually seen it!and the funny thing is i've met card carry lesbians that also didn't understand about privledge(note correct spelling). I personally would be mortified to be in a room with a lesbian women who is so indiffent to the realities of gaytrans women and the struggles of lesbian transwomen. I just hope i don't have to step on too many narrowmind lesbian head to help all womyn be included. but of cousre as a gay womyn i will support all my sisters trans or otherwise.
                    • Re: the fest "trans" policy...

                      Thu, November 13, 2003 - 5:46 PM
                      please define the following:
                      -card carrying lesbian
                      -gaytranswomyn
                      and Privilege (in general or something specific)
                      i don't think any self identifying lesbian would straight up be indifferent to the realities of gaytranswomyn without being indifferent to reality in general....
                      i don't know...i apologize if i'm coming of harsh...
                      i'm just completely frustrated.
                      i feel like we struggle so much amongst ourselves to define one another that i don't comprehend how we expect others that have NOTHING in common with us to begin to understand who we are....and the bottom line i believe is that it boils down to individuals. non-gay, gay, lesbian, bi, trans and the list goes on and on and on....and gender.....well i feel like gender is this huge continuum that society has chosen to break up into a dichotomy....a fallacy in it's own right...and of course there are going to be separatists because when people don't fit into the dichotomy they want everyone to know it...otherwise no one would be having this discussion in the first place....and whether it's because they are separatists or they are people who want everyone to know they are different and be included (not separated)....we'll call them inclusors (just for the hell of it) so now there are inclusors AND separatists....which again boils down to the genetically nurtured individual that each and everyone one of us becomes....
                      is anyone following cuz i kind of lost my train there....
                      any responses to that one?????
                      • Re: the fest "trans" policy...

                        Tue, November 25, 2003 - 1:51 PM
                        my comments were in response to apost by christaina regarding "trans manipulation" at the festival. I would love to know what trans manipulation is too? as for the definations-
                        card carrying lesbian-its what i've been accused of not being since my partners have been transmen and transwomen as well as being gender-variant myself. i don't know where to get the card and i'm not really interested in it anymore.

                        gaytranswomyn is a women who is transgender and is also gay or queer if you prefer.

                        privledge-that was joke about spelling-
                        privilege is when we have an advantage or access due not to merit but based on a trait such as gender,race,class,ethnicity etc.
                        dichotomy is a big problem, at least at the festival many of the older women i spoke to hadn't really complated that thier could be more than two genders. as for the transgendered policy alot of them had misinformation about transitioning and trans people. personally it was sad to hear it but it made me understand why they feel the way they do. education both on breaking down binary thinking and also on the realities of transgender people would be a good start.